SAP NIS2 Compliance: Mapping GRC, ETD, and IAG to Article 21(2) — The Matrix No SAP Vendor Publishes
No SAP vendor publishes this mapping: exactly which Article 21(2) measure GRC, ETD, and IAG satisfy — verified against CIR 2024/2690, gaps included.
No SAP vendor publishes this mapping: exactly which Article 21(2) measure GRC, ETD, and IAG satisfy — verified against CIR 2024/2690, gaps included.
CIR 6.6 does not set a patch deadline in days. See what it actually requires, and how Qualys TruRisk scoring maps to Annex 6.5 and 6.6.
Tenable finds vulnerabilities. NIS2 still needs the paper trail. What CIR 6.5/6.6 and Lumin’s exposure score do — and don’t — prove to an auditor.
Which NIS2 Article 21(2) letters does Cloudflare’s Magic Transit and WAF actually cover — and which six do they miss?
Okta NIS2 compliance mapped to Article 21(2)(i)-(j): which product covers what, and why CIR Annex Section 11, not “6.3,” is the requirement that applies.
Your Palo Alto stack won’t pass a NIS2 audit alone — see which Article 21 measures it covers, and the 7 that still need documentation.
Your Splunk dashboard isn’t audit evidence. See which correlation searches and retention settings satisfy CIR 2024/2690 Section 3.2 and Article 23.
CrowdStrike Falcon covers real detection and logging for NIS2 Article 21 — but the directive also demands documented policies no SOC tool writes for you.
Cisco’s security portfolio maps to only 4 of NIS2’s 10 Article 21(2) measures — and a popular “DNS security” citation doesn’t exist. Here’s the accurate mapping.
Microsoft Defender covers 4 of NIS2’s 10 Article 21(2) measures — not all 10. See exactly which, and what still needs a policy, not a product.